|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, September 14, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Entertainment
| Previous
| Next
Coming up the hard way
Though a star son in his own right, Puru Raj Kumar is slogging it
out like any other new comer. And if he accepts a villain's
role it is not for lack of choice, he says in a chat with SUBHASH
K. JHA.
ONE FRIDAY in April he was seen in two films ``Uljhan'' and
``Khatron Ke Khiladi simultaneously in the theatres. Puru Raj
Kumar, the guy who folded his hands, smiled and then raped the
female protagonist in ``Hamara Dil Aapke Pas Hai'', is urbane,
polite and soft-spoken in real life.
None of his father, the mythic Raj Kumar's legendary
eccentricities in the son. Except the booming baritone which can
hardly be called an eccentricity.
The only occasion when the affable Puru baulks is when you say,
``I'm `Shattered' after seeing his latest film `Uljhan'.''
There's an uncomfortable laughter on the other side. Ignoring the
reference to the ill-conceived desi remake of the Hollywood
thriller `Shattered', Puru says, ``But `Uljhan' did well in
Hyderabad in the first week. What do you say to that?''
Doesn't a tacky low-budget film like ``Uljhan'' do more
disservice than good to Puru's career?
``First of all I don't think ``Uljhan'' is a low-budget film.
Pehlaj uncle (that's producer Pehlaj Nihalani to us non-nephews)
didn't cut corners in the production. He spent quite a lot,''
Puru jumps to his producer's defence. A note of regret creeps
into Puru's voice when he speaks about his voice being dubbed by
someone else (Vivek Mushran) in ``Uljhan''. ``But that's because
I was playing Vivek Mushran's character with a changed face.''
Before we can actually digest this information Puru moves on.
``Besides, `Uljhan' was part of my backlog of films. You'll be
seeing me in some more of those in the near future. Then my fresh
lot of films will start. In ``Vadh'' I get to star with Anupama
Verma. In Mehul Kumar's ``Kabhi Kabhi Aisa Bhi Hota Hai'', Nana
Patekar and Mahima star with me. In ``Sarhad'' I share credits
with Rocky (Chandrachur Singh) and Mahima. The conversation
inevitably veers to Papa dearest. Was it an advantage or
disadvantage to have the mighty Raj Kumar for a father? ``If you
mean in terms of a career, I'd say no, definitely not. You see,
acting was a career I zeroed in on through the process of
elimination. After going through various options I decided this
was what I wanted to do. Dad had always kept his children
completely away from the film industry. When I told him about my
decision to become an actor, he made it clear I was on my own,
that unlike other star-fathers he wouldn't launch me personally.
On hindsight I respect him for his decision'', Puru trails off
thoughtfully as he remembers those dark tragic days after Prakash
uncle launched him in ``Bal Bramhachari.''
Yes he had worked with my dad in ``Muqaddar Ka Faisla``. But I
don't think my dad influenced Prakash Mehra in any way to sign
me. Puru shudders as he remembers the film. No comment on its
quality. It's just that dad Raj Kumar passed away when ``Bal
Bramhachari'' was released. I was completely numbed with grief.
There I was receiving calls from New Zealand from fans saying the
film had a roaring opening. But I couldn't react. I had gone
completely blank.''
The blank balance has ebbed with time, as it always does. Puru
regrets signing the wrong kind of films. But the villainous turn
in ``Hamara Dil Aapke Paas Hai'' and the terrorist's cameo in
``Mission: Kashmir'' have done Puru a wealth of good. Why the
out-and-out villain's role in ``Hamara Dil Aapke Pas Hai''?
``People think I did the role for lack of choices. Let them. I
know how much of a dilemma I went through before saying `yes' to
the film. I finally decided to do what you call an out-and-out
villain's role because I feel the line dividing good and evil has
blurred beyond belief. No one can define a villain clearly any
longer''.
Whatever the definition, Puru isn't thinking of playing one in a
hurry. ``If I did one villainous role I have several other films
on hand where I'm the conventional leading man. Even my dad never
believed in this image business. If I can at least be a non-
conformist like him I'd consider it an achievement.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Entertainment Previous : Juicy notes on ''Jaws'' Next : The Japanese American addiction | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|