|
T H E H I N D U O P P O R T U N I T I E S A Guide to Better Positions and Better Performance Wednesday, October 03, 2001 |
| Articles | Position wise | Category wise | Company wise | Location wise | Search Jobs | Home | | The Hindu Group |
MISCELLENAEOUS Sagespeak: Working with Women
THIS is easily one of the most difficult things to write about in
what has become one of the most socially sensitive topics in
corporate circles.
In India, certain social niceties are observed which have
disappeared from western practice soon after Noah and his family
disembarked from the Ark on Ararat. Men, for instance, will never
extend their hands to be shaken by women in India and often carry
on this behaviour when they go abroad. Men do not also maintain
eye contact with their lady colleagues and in many cases, if they
were to try; the action is likely to be misinterpreted.
With the current trend of transparency and equality taking place
in India women have taken and established their place on the
corporate ladder. While for the past few decades, women have
always been fairly low on the corporate hierarchy; today they
have risen to the top. While this is a positive sign, the Indian
corporate male, never the most aggressive, has now become mired
in a tizzy of confusion often not being able to relate to or
handle the situations that arise.
How, for instance does the normal Indian male react when his lady
boss summons him to her hotel room for a late night
brainstorming? Conversely, would he ask a female subordinate to
discuss a contentious point over a drink in his hotel room? What
is the correct, acceptable protocol in such situations?
A Acharya, Vice President HR and Chief Knowledge Officer of a
leading knowledge organisation says that it is getting
increasingly difficult to reconcile 21st century business
requirements with 18th century social norms. The result, he
points, out is that many organisations prefer not to hire women,
just to avoid the problem of painting themselves into such
corners; women too, would rather sacrifice promising careers on
the altar of social propriety. Acharya says that Indian corporate
male has not been able to dislodge the concept of social stigmas
attaching to themselves when in necessarily close professional
contact with female colleagues. While there might be men who are
concerned for the reputation of the lady, he is often more
worried that there will be some kind of familial repercussions at
home, one that he would be happier without. The very fact that he
foresees such an eventuality indicates that he is not applying
the professionalism required in such situations. The
circumstances are fraught with guilt, which will eventually lead
to a failure in management. To avoid this dilemma, fewer women
are hired. On the other hand, corporate women bosses have no
compunction in hiring men, and taking them on business trips,
and, yes, requiring them for private discussions late into the
night. Today, most men have no problem with this since they
cannot be blamed for the initiative. There are however, still a
few who may cavil since they feel awkward to be in such close
proximity to women who are not in their immediate family.
Examining the validity of the Indian male response to such
situations, we need to look at the practice in the west. While
there is certainly a greater degree of professionalism, it must
also be clearly understood that there is a quantum difference in
the promiscuity prevalent in the west. Intra-office cohabitation
is as common as it is casual. Often it is only peripherally
emotional. Deeper emotion and continuity are not often seen. The
contact is viewed as a biological need of the moment not much
different from the need to share a meal or a sip from the same
glass of water.
Hiring of qualified women is therefore coloured by factors that
are conjured by men in positions of hiring. C.Venkateshwara
Prasad, MD Tavelexpress says unequivocally that his agency had a
preponderance of women operatives because he finds them
efficient, dedicated, more conscientious and loyal than men in
similar circumstances but confesses that he is looking for more
men operatives as he feels uncomfortable using his female
operatives for facilitation and airport transfers late at night.
He finds it inconvenient to ask his lady operatives to deliver
tickets to clients even during the day. Such statements tend not
to augur too well for women professionals. If they are not going
to be hired, how can 21st century India see the arrival of the
Woman CEO?
Which brings us back to the point: What is the appropriate way
for gender interaction that is both effective and clinically
professional? The result of extensive surveys seem to indicate
that the modern Indian woman professional has indeed come of age.
In many ways, she has progressed beyond the fusty notions and
ideas of her male counterpart. Shantha Rupa Puthramvittal,
Knowledge Management Associate at Granville Carter Consultants
Ltd. Mumbai says: "If I have a business trip planned with my male
boss, I have no problems; I respect him and he treats me as he
would any other employee, with respect and consideration. If he
were to need me for an official discussion that went on late into
the night, I would not hesitate as I am certain of his motives
which have always been professional in every respect."
Puthramvittal is one of the new breed of women professionals who
view their professions from a new, clinical standpoint.
P.Vedhanbhatla, senior associate at Paulitt, Gunther and Smythe
(India) says: "I have no reservations in making outstation visits
with my senior associate. I have in fact been doing so for a
number of years. We are often mistaken to be married to each
other but it embarrasses neither of us though it may those who
make the mistake; I know that he has the greatest regard for my
reputation and is always mindful of social perceptions so I feel
no awkwardness in his company at anytime."
The answer in these cases would be that provided the man has no
hidden agenda, the modern Indian woman will have no hesitation in
behaving normally. It is only when the male participant has
motives that are less than pure when trouble arises. It requires
mutually acceptable, decorous behaviour that has no double
entendre or intentions to exploit. As society is also changing,
it has become of paramount importance to see that no question of
doubt exists in any of those involved. In all cases where gender
issues are involved, total transparency, accepted behaviour and
polite distance need to be ensured at all times. If any one of
these is not observed, problems will occur and the easy commerce
that may exist will be disturbed, to the eventual detriment of
the body corporate.
That women are competent and able to discharge their duties,
there can be no doubt. There is however considerable doubt about
their ability to perform well if their male colleagues do not
imbue circumstances with an ambience of easy familiarity untinged
by the spectre of exploitation and harassment. The lady
professional in India has come to stay. Let us make that stay a
happy and productive one.
S.RAMANUJACHARYA
professor1@sify.com
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu. |