|
T H E H I N D U O P P O R T U N I T I E S A Guide to Better Positions and Better Performance Wednesday, June 11, 2003 |
| Articles | Position wise | Category wise | Company wise | Location wise | Search Jobs | Home | | The Hindu Group |
MISCELLENAEOUS Rogue mercenaries unleash the ECV virus again!
A COUPLE of years ago, a young MCA graduate was referred to me
for a job. Since most IT companies did not recruit freshers, I
decided to hire him myself, despite there being no real post
vacant. A scant eight months later, he quit having received a
better offer from another company. He wanted to leave at once, as
he was to join them in a week's time.
A week? Seven days are too few even for a liberal organisation
with the most lenient HR policies.
It's not impossible to find a replacement at such short notice
but he should have known that he was violating one of the key
tenets of his contract of employment - the Notice Period!
Every employee is contracted to serve a notice period of one
month at least when at a junior level in an organisation while
those at the senior levels generally agree to serve a notice
period of two months or more) before they can - `demit
office'. The reason my young friend gave me was shocking,
apparently HR at his prospective employers had insisted that he
join them in a week or lose the offer!
Employment contracts usually state that should an employee not
serve the agreed notice period he would be required to forfeit
his salary for the period of the required notice.
Unfortunately, this particular clause is often misused by both
employees as well as organisations. An employee can be excused
from serving the notice period only in some special circumstances
like when the company disengages the employee on grounds of
questionable integrity or moral turpitude.
At these times, the company pays the due salary to the errant
employee. There are also times when employees need to leave for
reasons of medical or social exigency. At these times, the
employee will forgo his salary for the past period (technically
to defray the expense of hiring a temporary functionary to
discharge his duties till the organisation can find a replacement
for him).
Unfortunately, many employees turn this clause to their advantage
when they need to leave even when there is no medical or social
reason to demit office immediately. Forfeiting salary is not a
normal transaction because the company is not in the business of
earning its income from its errant employees. The withholding or
the recovery of money from exiting employees is merely a
deterrent to hasty departure.
Employment Contract Violation (ECV) Virus - The deadly ECV
virus that had threatened the IT industry has been revitalised
after a 3-year gap. When a contract is violated, it cannot be
seen just from an individual point of view. There are four
dimensions to this practice of Contract Violation- the employee
angle, the recruitment agency angle, the HR angle and the CEO
angle. In one way or the other, each of them is like a mercenary
looking out for himself .
As an individual, one may be tempted to walk out on his employer
when he gets a lucrative offer that pays more or provides him
better perks and incentives. Nary a thought is given to the
company that has trained him and given him the crucial work
experience that helped him get his new job. To the employee, what
he cares about is the enhanced package being offered.
The next dimension is of the Recruitment Consultants. A
recruitment consultant would like the employee to join the new
company the day after he gets the offer. This is because the
consultant gets paid only after the selected employee joins.
Secondly, there is a chance that the employee might have second
thoughts or worse still, look for another offer (through another
consultant). So longer the joining period granted, greater the
risk of the candidate not taking up the offer, necessitating the
search to be re-started for a suitable candidate; an expensive
and time consuming process.
HR Departments are equally to blame. Why does it give such a
short period for a candidate to join them, when the appointment
letter it issues to the same candidate stipulates a notice period
of 30 to 60 days? After all it is the department that is assigned
to uphold the sanctity of the employment contracts.
While encouraging an employee of another company to quit his job
with little or no notice, the department cannot stop one of their
own doing the same.
The HR Department however cannot be blamed totally because it is
the CEO who puts the pressure on HR.. Earlier, companies would
recruit people well in advance and keep them waiting on-the-bench
ready to meet any need.
Today the CEO follows the JIT (Just in Time) model - without
realising that if everyone follows this method of hiring, the
industry will throw up a number of incomplete or delayed
projects.
It is time the HR departments took stock of the situation. They
should insist on employees serving the stipulated notice time so
that an appropriate replacement can be found, inducted and put in
place.
No organisation can thrive as a mercenary Looking out only for
itself, where it will demolish its own culture as well as the
symbiotic relationship between organisations.
One solution I can suggest is, that the IT companies form an
Ethics Club (for want of a better name), comprising officers
representing the HR departments, recruitment consultancies and
the CEOs of the leading IT firms in each city. Similar clubs
exist to share data on compensation. This committee should be
able to put a stop to the practice of violating contracts. The
names of the employees and the companies that violate the
contract should be publicised, and possibly blackballed in the
community.
A committee of this kind could well be the possible panacea to
cure the dangerous and swiftly proliferating ECV virus that has
become a debilitating threat to the IT industry.
T. MURALIDHARAN
T Muralidharan is the Executive Chairman of TMI Network
murali.hyd@cnkonline.com
Copyright © 2003 The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu. |